okay, i'd think that one week of fighting is enough for 2 captured isralis... but the fight for the resolution at UN is also pretty rediculous.
from BBC news
"The US ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, said it was time for the Security Council to start considering a response, and the US did seek a long-term end to hostilities.
But he added: "Still no-one has explained how you conduct a ceasefire with a group of terrorists".
Israel's UN ambassador Dan Gillerman said he was disturbed that Mr Annan's report had not mentioned the word "terror".
"The first thing that must be addressed is cessation of terror before we even talk about cessation of hostilities," he said. "
i was just curious about the underlined quote. doesn't ceasefire means stop fighting, even if they are technically considered terrorists? stop means stop. nothing more. just argue about technicalities after stop fighting.
hm, and i'd personally like to see less rockets flying to kill people before addressing about the possible terrors. |